{"id":1320,"date":"2020-05-15T12:13:22","date_gmt":"2020-05-15T16:13:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ielrblog.com\/?p=1320"},"modified":"2020-05-15T12:13:22","modified_gmt":"2020-05-15T16:13:22","slug":"4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/","title":{"rendered":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue"},"content":{"rendered":"

On May 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals, sitting en banc<\/em>, by a\u00a0 9-6 decision<\/a>, overturned the decision of a smaller panel of the court, to allow the case to continue.<\/p>\n

The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland (\u201cRespondents\u201d) filed the action in the District of Maryland against the President in his official capacity. \u00a0They allege that the President is violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution by accepting prohibited \u201cemoluments\u201d from foreign and domestic governments. The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides:<\/p>\n

“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person<\/p>\n

holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent<\/p>\n

of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any<\/p>\n

kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”<\/p>\n

U.S. Const. art. I, \u00a7 9, cl. 8. The Domestic Emoluments Clause provides:<\/p>\n

“The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a<\/p>\n

Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the<\/p>\n

Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within<\/p>\n

that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”<\/p>\n

Id. art. II, \u00a7 1, cl. 7.<\/p>\n

The district court granted the President\u2019s motion to dismiss, except insofar as the complaint pertained to the Trump International Hotel three blocks from the White House.<\/p>\n

The President moved for certification to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to\u00a028 U.S.C. \u00a7 1292(b), seeking appellate review of four questions: (1) the correct\u00a0interpretation of the term \u201cemolument\u201d; (2) whether Respondents had an equitable cause\u00a0of action to bring the suit; (3) whether Respondents had Article III standing; and (4)\u00a0whether any court has the ability to issue equitable relief against the President in these\u00a0circumstances.<\/p>\n

The district court declined to certify an interlocutory appeal.<\/p>\n

In response, the President petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. \u00a0He asked\u00a0the appellate court either to direct the district court to certify an interlocutory appeal\u00a0or to order the district court to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. A panel of\u00a0this court granted the President\u2019s petition for a writ of mandamus and \u00a0found Respondents lacked standing and so \u201creverse[d] the district court\u2019s orders\u201d and \u201cremand[ed] with instructions to dismiss the\u00a0complaint with prejudice.\u201d In re Trump, 928 F.3d 360, 364 (4th. Cir. 2019<\/a><\/em>).<\/p>\n

The entire Fourth Circuit\u00a0 subsequently agreed to hear the case en banc<\/em>, vacating the panel opinion. In re Trump<\/em>, 780 F. App\u2019x 36 (4th Cir. 2019).<\/p>\n

In her decision for the majority , Judge Diana Gribbon Motz explained that a petitioner seeking mandamus relief bears the burden of showing that he has satisfied three requirements.\u00a0 Judge Motz explained the Supreme Court gas repeatedly rejected contention that a naked error of law amounts to an abuse of discretion entitling a petitioner to mandamus relief. \u00a0\u00a0In this regard, Judge Motz said \u00a0notwithstanding the President\u2019s vigorous assertion that the court erred in its legal analysis, he does not contend that the district court denied certification for nonlegal reasons or in bad faith.\u00a0 As a result, he is not entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to certify its orders for interlocutory review under \u00a7 1292(b).<\/p>\n

The court rejected the President\u2019s secondary argument.\u00a0 The President contended that, even if the court \u00a0\u201cconclude that the district court\u2019s certification discretion under \u00a7 1292(b) was sufficiently broad that a writ of mandamus directing certification is unwarranted,\u201d it \u201cnevertheless should grant mandamus directing the district court to dismiss [Respondents\u2019] complaint.\u201d\u00a0 Judge Motz ruled to obtain this relief, the President must establish that it is not merely likely, but \u201cclear and indisputable,\u201d that the entire action cannot lie. She found he has not done so.<\/p>\n

Judge Motz did not agree with the President\u2019s argument that \u201cemoluments\u201d indisputably include only \u201cprofit arising from office or employ\u201d (that is, payment for services rendered in performance of a formal job) and explained courts have not ruled on whether emoluments include income from the President\u2019s business (e.g., his lease on the D.C. hotel).<\/p>\n

Judge Motz rejected the President\u2019s argument that the court must issue a writ of mandamus\u00a0because this suit subjects the Executive Branch to \u201cintrusive discovery.\u201d\u00a0 Judge Motz explained that the discovery in the instant case \u00a0\u2014 business records as to hotel stays and restaurant expenses, sought from\u00a0private third parties and low-level government employees \u2014 does not implicate Executive power. The court does not believe the requests pertaining to spending at a private restaurant and hotel threaten any Executive Branch prerogative.<\/p>\n

Judge Motz disagreed with the President and dissenters over the fact that the separation of powers give the President discretion with respect to having to abide by the emoluments clause.\u00a0 Rather than vesting the President with any duty to execute the law. they foreign emoluments clause impose \u00a0restraints on\u00a0the President. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The dissents disagree, arguing that this duty is not only an official executive duty, but also one that encompasses the discretionary function of determining the meaning of \u201cemolument.\u201d<\/p>\n

In response to the dissenters, Judge Motz explained the idea that the President is vested with unreviewable power to both execute and interpret the law is foreign to our system of government. The Framers dispersed the authority to enforce the law and the authority to interpret it. Otherwise, the President alone has the ultimate authority to interpret what the Constitution means. Allowing the President to be the final arbiter of both the interpretation and enforcement of the law \u2014 as the dissents would \u2014 would gravely offend separation of powers.<\/p>\n

The dissenting opinions are more than three times as long as the majority\u2019s and characterize their colleagues in the majority as \u201cpartisan warriors.\u201d<\/p>\n

A Department of Justice spokesman confirmed that the President would appeal the case to the Supreme Court.\u00a0 If the Supreme Court accepts the case, the arguments may occur in the fall, at the height of the Presidential campaign.<\/p>\n

In a separate case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the court dismissed due to standing an action by the Democratic members of Congress. They have decided not to seek a rehearing by the full complement of judges.\u00a0 They have until July to decide whether to ask the Supreme Court to review the appellate court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On May 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, by a\u00a0 9-6 decision, overturned the decision of a smaller panel of the court, to allow the case to continue. The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland (\u201cRespondents\u201d) filed the action in the District of Maryland against the President in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[79,64,63],"tags":[159,160],"class_list":{"0":"post-1320","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-corruption","7":"category-lobbying","8":"category-transparency-and-governance","9":"tag-president-donald-j-trump","10":"tag-separation-of-powers","11":"entry"},"yoast_head":"\n4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On May 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, by a\u00a0 9-6 decision, overturned the decision of a smaller panel of the court, to allow the case to continue. The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland (\u201cRespondents\u201d) filed the action in the District of Maryland against the President in […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IELR Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/m.facebook.com\/intlenforcementlawreporter\/?ref=bookmarks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bruce Zagaris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ielr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ielr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bruce Zagaris\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bruce Zagaris\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66\"},\"headline\":\"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1056,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"President Donald J. Trump'\",\"separation of powers\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Corruption\",\"Lobbying\",\"Transparency and governance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/\",\"name\":\"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/15\\\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"IELR Blog\",\"description\":\"Official Blog of the International Enforcement Law Reporter\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66\",\"name\":\"Bruce Zagaris\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bruce Zagaris\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ielrblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/ielrblogadmin1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog","og_description":"On May 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, by a\u00a0 9-6 decision, overturned the decision of a smaller panel of the court, to allow the case to continue. The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland (\u201cRespondents\u201d) filed the action in the District of Maryland against the President in […]","og_url":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/","og_site_name":"IELR Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/m.facebook.com\/intlenforcementlawreporter\/?ref=bookmarks","article_published_time":"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00","author":"Bruce Zagaris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ielr","twitter_site":"@ielr","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bruce Zagaris","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/"},"author":{"name":"Bruce Zagaris","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66"},"headline":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue","datePublished":"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/"},"wordCount":1056,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["President Donald J. Trump'","separation of powers"],"articleSection":["Corruption","Lobbying","Transparency and governance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/","url":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/","name":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue | IELR Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-05-15T16:13:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/2020\/05\/15\/4th-circuit-court-of-appeals-permits-emoluments-case-against-trump-to-continue\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/","name":"IELR Blog","description":"Official Blog of the International Enforcement Law Reporter","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/#\/schema\/person\/e491a7e89d418cb82a8c67687806ab66","name":"Bruce Zagaris","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b88b62733380c051d9ae8ffa877632a9180505d62fe9bcec138e2038ecdcd51?s=96&d=monsterid&r=g","caption":"Bruce Zagaris"},"url":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/author\/ielrblogadmin1\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pas6ng-li","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1321,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1320\/revisions\/1321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ielrblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}