On September 2, 2020, the United States Department of the Treasury added to the list of Specially Designated Nationals Fatou Bensouda, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and Phakiso Mochochoko, the Head of the Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division.
The Treasury notice implements the executive order issued on June 11, 2020, by United States President Donald J. Trump imposing sanctions on “certain persons associated with the International Criminal Court.”
The Executive Order states the U.S. will impose tangible and significant consequences on those responsible for the ICC’s misconduct. They may include the suspension of entry into the U.S. of ICC officials, employees, and agents, as well as their immediate family members.
Even before the issuance of the Executive Order, the U.S. government had already revoked the visa of the ICC’s chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda. The Executive Order and sanctions may hinder the ICC’s recruitment of personnel.
The initial implementation selects the chief prosecutor and the individual in charge of enforcement cooperation. A major weakness of the ICC is its lack of its own police force, so that it cannot actually arrest an individual.
It remains to be determined how broadly the executive branch will apply the sanctions. This will be a major focus of persons interested in the court and in accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The imposition of sanctions is a setback to the effort to hold perpetrators of crimes meriting universal jurisdiction accountable. The sanctions constitute an attack on international and national judicial independence. It sets a bad example for the rest of the world at the very time when democracy is in jeopardy and the world community is struggling to bring accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity in longstanding conflicts, such as those in Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, and Yemen.
The sanctions undermine longstanding U.S. foreign policy to emphasize the rule of law and bring peace and stability by holding alleged perpetrators of crimes of universal jurisdiction accountable as well as prioritize international human rights. Especially when the sanctions are considered in the context of the U.S. still holding persons for twenty years in Guantanamo without trial, the sanctions will also hamper the ability of the U.S. to obtain international enforcement cooperation, especially from its allies.
During its annual meeting last month, the American Bar Association adopted Resolution 114, urging all national governments to “observe, respect, and protect the independence of the International Criminal Court.” It also “condemns threats by governments to the International Criminal Court and its officers and personnel in the performance of their duties.” Prior ABA policies and statements on the ICC and a timeline of the US-ICC relationship show that the ABA has from the start supported the operation of the ICC and U.S. proactive participation in it. The ABA ICC project’s board members, including former U.S. War Crime Ambassadors and a former Nuremberg prosecutor, have also written opinion pieces the Project’s board members wrote about the sanctions.
The implementation of the Executive Order against the ICC will further alienate U.S. relations with its closest allies, who are making contingency plans for the potential that Donald J. Trump may be re-elected. On July 17, 2020, European Union High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell made a statement on United States sanctions. He referred specifically to the U.S. unilateral sanctions against the ICC. Borrell said sanctions against those involved in the work of the ICC, its staff, and their families, as well as persons associated with the ICC, are unacceptable and unprecedented in scope and content.
Leave a Reply